|
Faversham Society Archaeological Research Group
|
|
Understanding Ospringe
Report for the Bier
House examination and associated excavations
Open Area OA65 and keyhole pit KP66
|
|
The
Bier House of the Church of St. Peter and St Paul
Water Lane, Ospringe, Faversham, Kent
|
|
Grid Reference: TR 00107 60301
|
|
1.
Introduction |
|
The
Bier House associated with the church of St. Peter and
St. Paul at Ospringe has intrigued local people, even
long term residents being confused as to what it was.
This confusion became increasingly evident during our
period of examination and excavation when our community
approach encouraged discussion with numerous people
visiting and passing the church and our excavations.
Community contact was further enhanced through a
fortunate overlap with a previously arranged church
‘Remember When?’ event. During this weekend, many local
people visited the church, examining displays and
photographs and talking about their memories of the
village and its surroundings. To join in more fully, we
moved our finds processing base activity to the grass
area in front of the church. This helped attract and
encourage visitors, our finds and studies giving them
the triggers for their memories, which we were able to
record. This was an extremely worthwhile and satisfying
weekend (the plough-mans’ lunches, teas, cakes and
bread-pudding were also satisfying with our numerous
purchases giving the church a welcome addition to their
fund raising activity).
|
 |
Fig
1: Finds processing base outside the Church
|
|
We had
chosen the Bier House site for three archaeological
reasons within our Understanding Ospringe project:
A. To conduct a ‘standing building’ examination and
record of the Bier House. In the process, to tidy the
area around it to restrict plant growth damage in
future.
B. To investigate the historic spring-head and
streamlet. This fed into the Westbrook which continues
down the valley though Ospringe and on to become
Faversham Creek, a tidal inlet of the river Swale and
the Thames estuary. Worked flints, early pottery,
historically active springs, sarsen stones and a church
all pointed to the need to understand more about this
spot, which just may be a location of major prehistoric
significance.
C. To examine the sarsen stones. Sarsens are
geologically not uncommon in this area and generally
across the chalk areas of southern England. They derive
from the tertiary sands and gravels, mostly now eroded
away, which overlay the chalk strata. These deposits
still exist on Syndale and Davington hills and are the
basis of the present gravel extraction industry at the
Faversham quarry about two miles to the north. Hence we
would be looking for tooling marks and other signs of
working on the stones and trying to establish whether
they had been part of an earlier structure.
All three of these activities will be reported here,
starting with the excavations of the open area behind
the Bier House: OA65 and keyhole pit KP66. The sarsen
examination and Bier House details will follow.
|
|
2. Location of the open area excavation |
|
Two
considerations affected the location of the open area
excavation and keyhole pit KP66.
a) The FSARG activities of 2008 in lower Water Lane
indicated that early human activity was present on the
western bank of the valley. (Reported in FSARG 2008 and
2009 reports KP52, KP55, KP59, KP61)
b) As the church is also on this bank it may indicate
that this spring location has been an area of early and
continuous ritual activity.
The location of the church does need fuller
consideration as it is some distance from the late
medieval and present village, which is situated along
Roman Watling Street with its medieval hospital (St Mary
of Ospringe)1 and more recent coaching inns.
It is, however, close to the medieval manor house of
Queen Court2. There is no clear indication of
the earliest church building on this site but structural
and historic records give dates of a church at this
location in the 12th century.3 |

|
Past maps,
from Jacobs’ 17745 to the most recent were
considered. There is no record of a structure at the
Bier House site until the 1907 map6. Historic
references are sketchy, with no mention in Hasted.
The 1865
map showed that a small pond existed in the area at the
rear of the Bier House location, feeding into the
Westbrook. This was before the Bier House was built.
Fig
2a: Location of OA65 and K66 on the OS 1st edition of
18654
|
|
The 1907 map, showing the
building, shows this pond replaced by a channel from a
spring marked as being at and to the south of the Bier
House. The spring and Bier House are hard against the
track, now a road, running east of the church and its
graveyard. The main stream is seen to be a few metres
wide by probably only some 30 to 50 cm deep in flood.
The depth of the channel from the Bier House is unknown.
|
Fig
2b: Location of OA65 and K66 on the OS special edition
of 19077
|

|
|
This
channel fed into the tree lined stream in the centre of
the field. In living memory this was banked by willows.
These willow beds were the source of the material used
for basket making to supply the hop and fruit industries
of this part of Kent and a number of photographs exist
showing both the willows and the basket makers.
|
 |
This picture is part of
the Croseur slide collection held at the Fleur de Lis
Heritage Centre, Faversham.
|
|
Fig 3: Families making baskets from willow in Ospringe,
around 1910.
|
|
At the
time of writing, but not available at the time of
excavation is the interesting scene shown in Fig 4,
looking westwards across the valley. This view dates
from the 1950s and shows Brook Cottages just before
demolition in the foreground. Although mostly hidden by
willows, the Bier House stream seems broad and vey
shallow. This knowledge has been useful in interpreting
the findings.
|
 |
|
Fig 4: The middle Westbrook valley looking westwards.
This photograph is the property of Arthur
Percival and reproduced with his permission
|
|
A
geo-resistivity survey was performed on a 20m by 20m
area of the field across the line of this channel during
the preceding April (2009) and this seemed to confirm
the line, indicating two branches, one from the rear of
the building and one branch further to the south,
possibly from the spring. It was decided to excavate
across the line to the south and east of the Bier House
in the hope of exposing the stream and one of its banks.
The area was also surveyed to establish heights above
Ordnance Datum (OD) and to fix the location to the Bier
House structure. The bridge over Vicarage Road, where
the stream once left the field, was also surveyed. An
attempt at augering (soil sampling) within the surveyed
area had to be abandoned due to the high proportion of
flints in the ground.
KP 66 was
opened later in the excavation period in an area
surveyed to approximate to the south western end of the
stream pond.
|
|
Fig 5: Results of a geo
resistivity survey of the area to the east of the Bier
House.
Each square represents
0.25 of a square metre.
Dark shading represents
wetter areas, light ones drier areas.
OA65
was sited to cut across the pattern from north to south.
|
 |
|
3. The procedures |
|
In
the field behind the Bier House an area was marked out
using the line of the western edge of the geophysical
survey area and centred on the centre line of the
building. This excavation area OA65 was marked with
string and was two by seven metres. Its position was
recorded by measuring to mapped corners of the Bier
House and its southern side was used as the base for
future measurements together with the western side as
the other axis i.e. the SW corner of OA65 being 0:0.
As this was a field, not our usual garden lawn, the turf
covering was poor but it was removed with reasonable
care and set aside for reinstatement. Excavation was
with hand tools and used single context removal of the
spoil, each context was recorded. All excavated soil was
examined and roughly sorted or sieved as appropriate.
Whenever possible, the spoil heap was scanned using a
metal detector. Finds were set aside for each context
and special finds were given three dimensional
coordinates to pinpoint the exact find spot. The only
specific features revealed were associated with the Bier
House structure itself and these were carefully recorded
during the examination of that structure.
Finally, the spoil was put back in, tamped down, and the
turf replaced.
|
|
4. The findings |
|
The
farm manager of this field had told us that the whole
field had undergone considerable disturbance in the
1970s when the willows were removed, and the streams
filled in by bulldozing the land level. No soil was
introduced from outside the field during this process.
This reconstructed field initially grew strawberries and
beans, but is now occasional pasture for a bull and
sheep.
The excavation in this flat field behind the Bier House
consisted of four active parts: a 7.1m by 2m open area
OA65, two keyhole pits dug within it KP65S and KP65N,
and the separate pit KP66.
The valley side to the west, around and under the
church, is of Head Brick earth on gravel with Thanet
sands and gravels beneath these at the top of the hill.
To the east the Upper Chalk, which is the basal geology
of this whole valley, is near the surface under a thin
topsoil layer. The chalk in the bottom of the valley is
covered by a layer of large flints covered in gravel,
deposited during the Pleistocene (glacial) period, and
covered with soils derived from the brick earth. These
Pleistocene flints and gravels were exposed at the base
of our excavations in OA65S and in KP66.
The lowest level excavated was in KP65S where context
[14] consisted of much blackened large flints giving way
to rust reddened large flints in [13] above it. The
lower large stained flints and the gravels on top of
them are the basal geology of the spring/stream/pond
system at this Bier House location. The geology has an
iron content and the anaerobic conditions at the lower
level gives the flints the black (ferrous) iron oxide
colouration and the more aerated upper layer the rust
red (ferric). The gravel and sand of context [11] was
on, not within, the lower flint matrix. Its upper part
was however mixed with building brick-rubble, tile
fragments and medium sized flints as context [10].
It seems that [10] was a rubbish dump in the pond/stream
or is the edge of the banking of the stream/pond itself,
with separate events dumping material onto it. This
mixed zone continued to the north where it thinned to
become the underlying sand of [11]. During excavation,
it was decided that contexts [10] and [11] were evidence
of the same dumping of building waste and the contexts
were merged.
All of the above excavation took place in KP65S a
keyhole pit 1m by 1m positioned at the southern end of
the open area OA65. Above context [10] was a fine
yellow-brown clay layer [07]. Although it was under
0.5cm thinning to nothing in the south, it thickened to
the north of the OA65 excavation before thinning again
7.1m away at the northern end where another area of
dumped building material rose through it, [09]. The
surface of [07] was well defined and very level at 10.5
m OD and at an average depth from the surface of 45cm.
The clay may have been deposited out of solution as a
sediment layer following a hill-wash storm event filling
the pond. The surface of this fine clay had animal
tracks indented into its surface indicating that it was
either the lower surface of a shallow pond or the
evaporative remains of one. The rats, or maybe water
voles, had been tracking across this from the bank area
at the base of the Bier House.
Above the pond surface [07] a brown soil with moderate
flint content [03] covered the whole area of OA65 for 10
to 12cm. On this surface and aligned with the Bier
House, a small pit with a piece of wood at the bottom
was probably the remains of a fence post. From the base
of this pit to the surface of the clay [07] below it was
an animal burrow of similar size to the track marks on
[07]. Adjacent to this to the south were two more
burrows. They all headed down but towards the Bier
House.
On top of [03] the area was covered by a matrix of
similar brown soil but with a much higher flint content
of larger flints of 5 to 10 cm. length [01]. These
separate but similar contexts represent the field
levelling and agriculture activities of the 1970s. They
seem to show the initial activity moved the top soil
from the neighbouring area into the pond/stream as [03]
followed by [01] which was probably initially a
neighbouring underlying context. This would explain the
larger flints and the presence of a number of worked
flints in this now surface layer.
|
 |
Fig 6: Flints from
context 01.
Pleistocene large flint pebbles modified in the Bronze
Age.
|
|
In the KP65S area, two
intermediate contexts were probably early pond filling
activity, soil from the adjacent willow tree removal, or
fly-tipping prior to the levelling. They are; [06] a
grey brown soil with numerous small pieces of chalk and
small flints, and [04] a smaller area to the south-west
of similar soil but with larger flints, bricks and
stone.
Context [09] was the base layer of the northern end of
the excavation and consisted of typical builder’s rubble
of flint, tile, brick and bottle glass. It was taken to
be a dumped context.
|
|
 |
|
Fig 7: a) Western baulk
of OA65, southern section, with context labels
|
 |
Fig 7:
b) Scale section of whole
western baulk face.
|
|
Harris Matrix
Context Interpretation
01 2nd and last phase of field in-filling
|
05 fill of small pit possibly a fencing post hole
|
02 cut of the small pit|
|
03 } stages in the in-filling of the
04 } spring/stream/pond and the
06 } 1st phase of field levelling
|
07 stream/pond silt possibly following a storm event
|
09 – 10 – 11 various episodes of tipping into the
stream/pond or onto its banks
|
12 pre-historic/natural sand and gravel surface
|
13 natural geology
|
14 natural geology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. The sarsen stones |
|
During the above
activities and the clearing of the base of the Bier
House the large sarsen stone and a smaller one were
examined for tool marks or signs of working but none
were found. There were no indications that these two
stones formed any substantial presence at this location.
This is far from conclusive evidence that they did not
have some previous purpose but clearly the building of
the Bier House and its repair activity has removed any
evidence. The main material for the base foundation
structure of the building seems to be old building
material in the form of brick-work ‘waster’ brick debris
consistent with a demolished brick garden wall or it is
general building hard-core. |
|
6.
Bier House |
|
A Bier House is defined in
the National Monuments Thesaurus as a ' building
containing a bier, a moveable stand on which a corpse,
often in a coffin, is placed prior to burial'8.
It may be used because of inclement weather, lack of
space in a town mortuary, remoteness from a town
mortuary or simply delays in circumstances of the
funeral. English Heritage lists only eleven bier houses
in England, five of which are in Kent9. Four
of the five are in the Faversham area, at nearby
Sheldwich, Selling and Boughton under Blean10.
This may have been due to the desire of the local church
dignitaries, a local fashion at the time of building at
the turn of the 18th to19th century, or a functional
response to need in this area. Further documentary
investigation is needed.
Many local people have been able to confirm the Ospringe
Bier House's gradual dereliction during the post second
world war years (1940s to 1960s). They also supplied
many varying tales from childhood. These and the
associated memory confusions added to our entertainment
during the ‘Remember When’ weekend at the church. One of
these tales was clearly a muddled childhood memory of
this near ruin in the 1950s. One gentleman was recalling
a vivid childhood picture of the Bier House with much
detail of pulleys, sluices and a water-wheel, and summer
days catching newts in the sluice pond. This puzzled us
for some days until an older member of the childhood
gang corrected the tale. The confusion was with a memory
of the old water mill building further down Water Lane.
We also had tales of fathers as young men looking
through the crack in the doors and seeing the racks of
bodies etc. This was all good social history but it was
light on facts.
|
|
Fig 8: The Bier House, view from the
road
What we
did establish was that the derelict building was
repaired during the 1980s seemingly as a community
project giving work/training to young people, presumably
a Manpower Services project. At the present time (2009)
the building is used as a store for chairs by the church
as the single room is of sound fabric and the roof is in
good condition. The outside however, was in danger of
vegetative damage by ivy and elderberry trees. These
have now been cut back or killed. A series of drawings
of this flint, brick and stone building have been
produced as a standing building exercise. (See Appendix
1. Robinson, forthcoming) |

|
|

|
Fig 9: WC with excavated culvert
At the rear of the
building is a toilet area and we found this in a poor
state as a result of minor vandalism? The small open
enclosure consists of a urinal wall with drain gully to
the north and a water closet (WC) to the south. This
drain ran through the wall and it was assumed that both
areas discharged into the cesspit, now filled in with
rubble, found outside the north east corner of the
building. |
|
The
door of the WC area was missing although a rotting door
post was present. There was no sign of a toilet bowl but
the floor of the eastern end of this closet, where it
would have been, had broken slabs of 2cm and 1 cm thick
slate covering an earth and debris surface. Markings on
the walls clearly indicated that the slate formed the
structure of a box for the seating. Removal of the top
of the earth revealed a broken drain pipe heading
towards the cesspit. On examination of the outside of
the building, as the nettles and shrubbery were removed,
an arch had been revealed in the brickwork at ground
level at the rear of this closet area. The outside and
inside of this area were excavated but not the cesspit
itself.
The arched brick work was examined and
the ground beneath it removed to reveal the lower
section of wall to have been open but seemingly later
almost bricked up, leaving a small gap at the top. This
meant that the area under the seat had been an open drop
with the possibility that the drainpipe was a later
addition when the cesspit was installed. The area under
the seating area was excavated, and the finds will be
described in Appendix 1 (forthcoming).
|
|
7. Interpretation
|
The WC arrangements at the
rear of the Bier House do have a bearing on the
interpretation of the some of the excavation findings in
OA65. The discovery of the drainage system under the WC
area and the wastepipe system to the cesspit does
indicate the probability of a change of design at some
point. The presence of building material dumped into the
stream area could be linked to that change.
Our survey work showed that the levels of the fine,
silty clay layer [07] and the large drainage pipe under
the WC area are the same. [07] Is, it seems, the stream
level on top of a gravel and flint natural aquifer which
itself is on the underlying chalk, with minimal brick
earth clay being present. The bottom of the pipe is at
10.5 OD. The central section of [07] is at 10.51 and the
present ground level under the centre of the Vicarage
road bridge is 10.27 OD giving a probable stream and
channel surface drop of between 0.25 to 0.5m across the
field of direct distance 140metres.
It now seems clear that the rising contexts [10] to [07]
represent a channel bank consisting of dredged and
dumped material. The material of [09] is not so clear
but can be taken as the line of the other bank on the
northern side. Further work would be required to make
this clearer.
The material of KP66 is difficult to understand. It does
represent dumping activity to the north but the flint in
the south eastern corner could possibly be a further
southern banking of the channel or an earlier bank
associated with the pond. The geophysics does indicate a
branching of the low resistivity plots. KP 66 was on the
line of this southern branch and surveyed in as the area
of the end of the small pond. It is now clear that this
spring, pond and stream were really no more than near
surface features through most of their recent past and
the sandy gravels may indicate that this has long been
the case. The Westbrook below and in Ospringe has been
managed extensively since the middle ages but this flat
valley area in front of the church, in memory a meadow
with a willow lined stream, does not seemed to have been
altered much over time. |
|
8. Final Comments |
|
Further historic
documentary research and contact with other local people
would help to give a fuller understanding of this
building and its spring. The work reported here has been
able to show pre-historic, Roman and early medieval
activity in the area and has contributed to our
Understanding Ospringe project. |
|
9. Acknowledgements |
|
We would like to thank The
Rev Ali Duguid and the church community, Gerald Hadley
of Queen Court and the present and past residents of the
Ospringe area, who gave us their knowledge of this field
and its surrounding buildings. They also provided vivid
personal memories both accurately and less so, but
always willingly and entertainingly.
Jim Reid
December 2009
|
 |
|
The OA65 team
Rebecca, Lesley, Ron, Sue, Jim, Nigel, Mo
and Keith
|

1Kent HER
number Hospital of St Mary, Ospringe TR 06 SW 15
2Kent
HER number Queen Court, Ospringe TR 06 SW 13
3Kent
HER number St Peter & St Paul, Ospringe TR 06 SW 14
4OS
1865 (1904 reprint) Sheet XXXIV Scale 1:2500
5Jacob,
E 1774 History of Faversham republished 1774 by the
Faversham Society, Faversham
6OS
1907 Sheet XXXIV Scale 1:2500
7OS
1907 op.cit.
8http://thesaurus.english-heritage.org.uk
9www.imagesofengland.org.uk
10Kent
HER numbers: Sheldwich TR 05 NW 79, Selling: TR05 NW 45,
Boughton: TR 05 NE106
|
|
 |