|
Faversham Society Archaeological Research Group
|
|
Understanding Ospringe
Report for Keyhole
K64
|
|
Manor Pound Field, Ospringe, Faversham, Kent
|
|
Grid Reference: TR 00081 60460
|
|
1.
Introduction |
|
The location of Keyhole Pit (K) 64
corresponds to a level above the former Westbrook along
which a marked concentration of prehistoric settlement
has been found during the Understanding Ospringe
project.1 The site lies midway between the
church and K61 (Dawson’s Row) where a Bronze Age flint
manufacturing site is currently being excavated. The
adjacent cottages are a recent conversion from a barn
belonging to Queen Court Farm, this barn having been
used in the 20th century as a farm stable.2
Field walking of the Manor
Pound Field had previously taken place. (Report: Reid
forthcoming, website 2010).
|
|
 |
|
Fig
1: Location of K64, converted barn cottages in
background. Viewing north.
|
2. Location of pit
K64 was sited in the uncultivated northern margin of
Manor Pound Field, near the fence line at the back of
the cottages. The pit was aligned to bisect the fence
line that separated the two cottages. The northern edge
of the pit was 2.6 metres from the fence line the
eastern edge of the pit was 25.75 metres from the road
fence line. The site height has not been levelled; from
the map contours and spot heights it is estimated to be
between 16 and 18 metres. |
|

|
 |
 |
Fig 2a: Location of K64
(18653)
|
Fig 2a: Location of K64
(19074)
|
|
The geology on this
western side of the Westbrook valley is Head Brickearth
overlying the Upper Chalk with possibly a Thanet Sands
layer sandwiched between, (as it is at the Syndale
hilltop nearby). |
|
3. The procedures |
|
|
The
one metre square was pegged out using the planning
square and the area delineated marked with string. The
position of the square was recorded by measuring to the
fence-line of the houses to the north and the fence-line
of the road. The pit was then hand excavated using
single contexts. Due to the short time available for
the excavation and the nature of the material excavated,
much of the work was performed using heavy hand tools,
trowelling only being used when a change of context
became apparent. The excavated material was sieved or
hand sorted (when it consisted of flints too large to
sieve). Finds were set aside for each context. Flints
were examined for evidence of working. The spoil was
returned to the pit.
|
|
4. The findings |
|
From
ground level down to 350 to 400mm [01], the context
consisted of plough soil that could only be broken up
with vigorous pick axing. This consisted of weakly
cemented, soft, greyish-brown, well sorted, silty-clay,
containing occasional flints which were small to medium,
sub angular, sub rounded and angular. Small quantities
of brick and tile were found, along with several pieces
of plastic and oyster shells and one piece each of
glass, bone, animal tooth, clay pipe stem, mortar and
19th century pottery.
|
 |
Fig
3: View down to [4] and [5], showing changes in colour
through [1], [2] and [3]. Note the characteristic
bright 'ginger' of brickearth emerging.
|
|
At 350/400mm the soil
colour changed to a more yellow-brown (context 02) and
became strongly cemented, soft, light yellow-brown, well
sorted sandy clay. This contained occasional flints
which were small to medium and sub angular or angular.
There were small and infrequent inclusions of chalk,
bone, clay pipe, iron, coal and charcoal and several
small and very small pieces of brick and tile.
At
600mm the deposits became lighter yellow with greyer
brown patches (Context 03). The colour darkened if
left for a while (oxidisation). This was a weakly
cemented soft/firm yellow-brown, moderately sorted
clayey sand, with occasional small flints and one piece
of brick.
|
|

|
At
680mm [4] a layer of flints was encountered right across
eastern side of pit, set in a soil matrix that was much
darker than the contexts above. The North West corner of
pit did not show any flints initially.
Fig 4: Surface of [04] flint layer
|
|
When,
however, this quadrant was removed [5] the material
consisted of large flints with clayey sand and gritty
clayey sand/shingle, with no artefactual content at all.
Fig
5: After removal of[05] in the northwest corner of the
keyhole
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
5. Interpretation |
|
Context [1] and [2] contained finds that were
attributable to agricultural activity of the last two
centuries. No evidence of any prehistoric activity was
found, although all flint items in [03] and [04[were
carefully examined. Interestingly, no medieval 'midden
scatter' type abraded pottery sherds were found either,
a fact which is true for the whole of Manor Pound Field
examined during the field walking activity in 2008 and
2009. This implies that this part of the Westbrook
valley was not under ploughed cultivation until the 18th
century. Medieval midden scatter type deposits have been
found further north down Water Lane.5 |
|
|
6. Final comments
|
|
This was a hard and
discouraging pit to dig, but the findings were well
worth recording. A negative result is not as exciting
as a positive one, to put it mildly, but is just as
important scientifically. |
|
7. Acknowledgements |
|
Thanks to the Brays of Ham
Farm (tenants) and to Shepherd Neame (land owners) for
allowing us to dig in this location. Sorry we didn't
find anything exciting, but archaeologically this was
the right place to dig!
John and Caroline
Clarkstone
December 2009

1See FSARG
website
www.community-archaeology.org.uk/projects/Understanding
Ospringe
2Gerald
Hadley, former farm manager, pers.comm
3OS
1865 (1904 reprint) Sheet XXXIV Scale 1:2500
4OS
1907 Sheet XXXIV Scale 1:2500
5See
FSARG Website op.cit. Ks 54, 55 |
|
 |