|
Faversham Society Archaeological Research Group
|
|
Understanding Ospringe
Report for Keyhole
46
|
|
42
Ospringe St, Ospringe, Faversham, Kent
|
|
Grid Reference: TR 00255 60925
|
|
1.
Introduction |
Number
42 is on the north side of Ospringe Street and is one of
five (36 to 44) early Victorian terraced properties.1
42 was formally a Post Office and still has a small post
box set into its front wall. It also has a series of
out-buildings to the rear.
|
 |
 |
Fig 1a: The location of
Keyhole 46 in 18652
|
Fig 1b: The location in
19063
|
These outbuildings adjoin
a similar series in the neighbouring property to the
west, number 44. The long garden area is paved near the
house and outbuildings, giving way to lawn, flower beds
and trees towards a rear wall. The garden backs onto an
undeveloped area of managed open space associated with
the modern development of Sheerways. The rear wall is of
mixed age but is thought to be on the line of and in
places part of the original building of a short-lived
barracks block (Fig 2). The only map of the barracks is
from 1805.4 This map is displayed in the
Maison Dieu museum at the Ospringe Street/Water Lane
junction. It is known that the barracks was used between
1790 and 1815 during the troubled Napoleonic period.
Later it housed the over crowded Faversham work-house
until the new workhouse was built in 1836 following the
National Reforms.5
|
 |
|
Fig 2: Napoleonic
Barracks 1803 with approximate positions of keyholes
|
|
2. Location of keyhole pit |
|
The
position of a storeroom and canteen block identified on
the map as D and E fell within the bounds of this house
and garden so it was possible that a section or
demolition material still existed. KP46 was set where it
was hoped this area would show a presence, about 8 m
into the lawn area, back from the house and its paved
area. During pre-excavation discussions it was revealed
that the neighbouring house owners had found a poorly
covered in stairway under their western garden wall area
during garden redesign work. This had not been recorded
and had been filled in for safety.
|
|
3. The procedures |
|
A one metre square was
pegged out using the planning square and the area
delineated marked with string. Its exact location was
measured in with reference to the rear buildings which
are clearly present on today’s OS maps. Turf was removed
carefully from the square, rolled and set aside in
plastic bags. The keyhole was then hand excavated using
single contexts, each of which was recorded.
From the top of [06] only
half the keyhole was excavated. The surface [04] up to
where it thinned to reveal [06] was used as the working
surface for excavation of [06] and below in the eastern
half. This surface enabled safe excavation to reach a
depth of 1.36m. The final act of excavation was to
remove the [04] context adjacent to the brick path. This
confirmed that the path was not located on a wall base
but on the soil matrix the same as [04].
Samples of the
excavated soil were examined meticulously. Contexts [02]
to [04] were sieved, however only the south east
quadrant of [01], [06], [07] and [08] was sieved. The
remainder of the spoil from each was hand examined as
each bucket was emptied into a separate large bag. This
separation was in case it was found necessary to sieve
100%. All spoil heap bags were scanned using a metal
detector. Finds were set aside for each context. Any
features and special finds revealed were carefully
recorded. Finally, the spoil was put back in, tamped
down, watered and the turf replaced.
|
|
4. The findings |
|
Context [01] was garden topsoil in the west 13cm thick
overlaying a series of cinder (ash) layers and shingle
rich soil, with dense ash to the west where it formed a
path contexts [02], [03], [04], and [05]. [01] deepened
to the east to a 30cm thick general cindery garden soil
matrix on top of [06] a clay based soil. This [01]
context showed considerable churn with pottery fragments
ranging in date from a piece of early medieval to late
post medieval with only traces of the [02] and [03]
contexts showing away from the path line.
At
13cm the western half was wholly ash and formed the base
of a slab path, now removed (pers. comm. Householder).
Further excavation on this side confirmed this ash layer
was one of a sequence of ash paths, given the single
context [02] as no discernable dating material was
present within the ash layers, the pottery all being the
same late post medieval red ware, 23g and glazed ware,
90g. Figure 3 shows the series in section on the
north-west section.
|
 |
Fig 3:
Contexts [01]-[05]: the pathway.
In the west underneath the ash-rich layer [01] was [03]
a gravel-rich layer which spread over half the excavated
surface, thinner to the east away from the path area.
This contained domestic fire ash/clinker but less
kitchen rubbish, again with only late post medieval
wares but a smaller quantity, 20g and 31g. Below this a
clay rich ashy soil [04] sloped and thinned towards the
east, this again
contained late post medieval pottery, 57g and 85g but
with a single 3g piece of possibly earlier type. Along
what
|
|
was now
clearly a path on the north western side, this context
gave way to [05] one containing a number of whole and
part red-coloured bricks with only 17g of late post
medieval pottery. Away from this brick path the ashy
soil with clay matrix [04] continued across the
excavation. It was decided to continue the excavation
away from this path and concentrate on the eastern 0.5m,
the western side with its path remaining at a depth of
25cm to 35cm.
Other than
[03] and [05] the quantities of animal bone, shell and
iron in contexts [01] to [06] were similar and contained
nothing striking. Those of coal/coke/slag were only high
in the path contexts. Quantities of glass also
diminished with depth, again with nothing striking.
Context
[06] was a layer underlying and with more clay than both
[04] to the west and [01] in the east. The clay was as
pockets within this matrix. [06] contained brick and
tile building material, mortar or plaster as in the
higher contexts but here the mortar/plaster was soft and
there was also much more flint and chalk. Although it
contained similar quantities of bone there was less
shell and coal/coke/slag but more iron.
Late-post-medieval pottery was again present, 11g red
ware, 91g glazed, but here in addition 9 sherds (42g) of
medieval were identified. [06] also contained fish-bones
and dressmaking pins (found during hand sorting!). In
the eastern quadrant a yellow-brown clay [07] containing
some gravel/shingle and part house bricks of a red
colour, was uncovered. This shingle and clay matrix
contained 1kg of building material but less mortar, a
further increase in chalk but less flint, and minimal
coal and ash, iron and shell. Few pieces of clay tobacco
pipe were found in the whole excavation and [07] had the
most with only 12g. 18g of late post medieval red ware
pottery was here joined by 13g of medieval date. The
quantity of animal rib bone although small, 49g, was
twice previous contexts. This layer thickened towards
the east resembling a demolition layer in the section. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig 4: The east to south side of the
keyhole, showing the full depth.
At 1.05m
the clay content increased to become a clay soil [08]
with scattered pieces of tile, chalk, oyster shells, and
flints, some with shell mortar attached. There were now
no pieces of brick but the greatest quantity of animal
bone.
Two of the roof tile pieces had peg holes. Context [08]
was taken down to 1.36m where excavation frustratingly
had to stop as Roman period and earlier |
 |
|
pottery were found.
A single piece of later
period glazed green-ware pottery of the London type was
also present, however. The total pottery retrieved from
[08] was dominated by the 31g piece of pre-historic,
probably late Iron Age, and the 7g of Roman (one piece
Samian ware and one Romano-British) but also included 16
g of medieval and 3g late-medieval.
|
|
5. Interpretation |
|
The
evidence for the barracks is slight being limited to
context [07], a shingle/clay surface thickening towards
the east and containing demolition material. Of great
interest to the householders and archaeologists was [08]
as it revealed the evidence of Roman and pre-historic
activity in the Ospringe area. This context, although
churned to some extent, contained shell-mortared flints
i.e. evidence for a former structure probably of
medieval date. The absence of late and post medieval
pottery is a surprise when it is so abundant in nearby
Faversham gardens. The garden path layers [02] to [05],
although intriguing failed to reveal significantly
different dating finds to be useful and was not part of
the barrack buildings.
The animal bone
records show the greatest quantity at the lower levels
with [07] having over twice that at younger levels and
[08] three times. This is likely to be associated with
the path dominating the other contexts and [01] being a
more modern churned soil when, unless a dog was present,
bones were not discarded in gardens in quite the same
way as previously.
|
|
6. Final comments
|
|
At the final depth the
family of the household were invited to leave a modern
object to act as a ‘time capsule’ item, in this case it
was a redundant (Sharp) pocket calculator. |
|
7. Acknowledgments |
Great thanks to Jan Stuart
and her family who allowed us to dig in their garden and
showed so much interest.
|
|
 |
|
Fig
5: Suzanne gets down to it while Lesley, Pat and
Poppy get down to sieving and sorting
|
Jim Reid
November 2008

1
Swale Borough Council c1990 Townscape survey:
Ospringe Village
2OS
1st edition 1865 Sheet XXXIV 1:2500
3OS
3rd edition 1906 Kent Sheet 34.09 1:2500
4Kent
County Records office.
5Stevens
J 2002 The Faversham Union Workhouse: the Early Years
No 80 in the Faversham Papers, Faversham Society |
|
 |