|
Faversham Society Archaeological Research Group
|
|
Understanding Ospringe
Report for Keyhole
43
|
|
22 Ospringe St, Ospringe, Faversham, Kent
|
|
Grid Reference: TR 00327 60893
|
|
1.
Introduction |
Numbers 21
and 22 Ospringe St and the shop premises of A.J.
Barkaway (butchers) with adjacent car park, stable,
small paddock and gardens, occupy a corner plot at the
junction of Grove Place and the Street. The cottages
were constructed around 1650 of red brick with roofs
clad in Kent peg tiles and with wooden casement windows:
they form one of the earliest surviving buildings in the
village. The shop, constructed around 1811, is brick
built with ceramic tile cladding and a Kent peg tile
roof. The two barns/storehouses were constructed around
1850 and the stables are a recent build.1
The whole plot occupies a previously uninvestigated part
of the site of the medieval (built c 1234) Hospital of
St Mary of Ospringe, nowadays known as the Maison Dieu.
Other parts of the site were excavated in 19772,
19903 and 20074. St Marys was
mostly demolished after the reformation, with only two
buildings surviving, both on the south side of the
Street. An inventory of 1571 gives a useful snapshot of
this plot at that particular time.5
|
 |
 |
|
Fig
1a: Location of K43 in 18656 |
Fig
1b: Location of K43 in 19077 |
|
2. Location of pit |
|
The grassed surface of the
paddock shows a distinct pattern of raised areas,
explained by the householders as pathways remaining from
previous use of the area as allotment gardens. A
geo-resistivity survey showed, however, clear traces of
a possible underlying structure, probably related to St
Marys Hospital. (See Appendix 1) Rather than excavate in
the paddock, which may at some time in the future be a
development site and therefore excavated
professionally, it was decide to dig in the rear
|
|

|
garden of number 22,
although the land level was somewhat higher due to
levelling work for the lawn. K43 was carefully located
in line with a raised strip which had also shown up on
the geo resistivity results as a possible medieval
structure.
Fig 2: Suggested
layout of St Marys of Ospringe taken from Smith 19778 |
|
3. The procedures |
|
A one metre square was
pegged out using the planning square and the area
delineated marked with string. The position of the
square was recorded by measuring to mapped corners of
the house. Turf was removed carefully from the square,
rolled and set aside in plastic bags. The pit was then
hand excavated using single contexts, each of which was
fully recorded. At a depth of around 30 cm a salt glazed
drainage pipe was revelled running north to south. This
was recovered and the pit extended 0.5m to the west and
re-measured to the corners of the house. The keyhole was
then excavated to the maximum safety depth of 1.2
metres. All excavated soil was sieved meticulously, and
the spoil heap scanned using a metal detector. Finds
were set aside for each context and special finds were
given three dimensional coordinates to pinpoint the
exact find spot. Any features revealed were carefully
recorded. Finally, the spoil was put back in, tamped
down, watered and the turf replaced. |
|
4. The findings |
|
The first context 01 was
friable, fine grained dark brown soil with a high ash
content and small to medium sized inclusions of building
materials, pebbles and chalk, across the whole pit. 02
was a looser mix, with a hump of building material and
bottle glass fragments over the eastern half 03: this
proved to be over the pipe. This pipe had no obvious
connection with manholes and other known pipes in the
garden. 04 and 05 were the infill and cut of the pipe
trench. They were recorded and then this half of the pit
was back filled and the western half extended (see
above). The large
amount of pottery found in contexts 1-4 was nearly all
17th-19th century red wares or
transfer decorated blue and white 19th
century Staffordshire mass produced. A single sherd of
medieval and two sherds of Roman pottery were found
mixed in with this. Other finds included a 1925 George V
half penny, a small cast copper alloy boot buckle c
1720-1790, a lead disc with raised cross, probably 17th
century and two copper alloy lace ends. An unusual find
from 03 was the nib part of a quill pen.
|
 |
 |
|
Fig
3: 18th century buckle9 and
undated quill pen nib. |
|
Beneath 03, chalk
inclusions greatly increases particularly against the
northern baulk. When taken down another 10 cm, a
consolidated chalk surface was revealed 07 with a
distinct edge around 60 cm from the north baulk, running
east-west across the keyhole. Further excavation
followed this chalk down to the south where it formed
another level surface 10 cm further down, occupying the
south east corner of the keyhole. Excavation in the
south west corner showed that this chalk was adjacent to
or lay on top of a level bed of small flints and
pebbles 08, at a depth of 1.2m. Although some post
medieval and later pottery was found at their level.
There were also some sherds of medieval and late
medieval wares.
The chalk and flint features were cleaned up but left
unexcavated.
A considerable amount
of animal bone was recovered from contexts 1-7 some
showing evidence of butchery and other arthritic ageing.
Shell was notable by its absence (we usually find
masses in Faversham area pit). Clay pipe fragments were
found at all levels but no significant dating
conclusions could be drawn from them.
|
|
 |
|
Fig 4: Viewing westwards.
The two level chalk features is clearly visible with the
flint surface, lower still, at the far top left.
|
|
5. Interpretation |
|
After the false start
caused by the pipe, this excavation was straightforward.
The consolidated chalk features followed the exact line
of the raised areas evident in the paddock. The two
levels of the chalk surface may be related to a robbed
out foundation for the lower part and an internal floor
level for the higher surface. The flint/pebble area may
be part of a courtyard surface outside the building. |
|
6. Final comments
|
|
This little keyhole and
the geo resistivity survey do need to be referred to any
archaeologist undertaking a review of the St Marys
Hospital site, whether in mitigation of development or
for more academic purposes. |
|
7. Acknowledgements |
|
We are very grateful for
the help and cheerful support of the Barkaway family and
their employees, and only sorry that we did not find the
desired gold cup!
Keith Robinson
December 2008
|
|
Appendix 1
Resistivity
Plots for Barkaways paddock and the garden of 20-22
Ospringe St.10
The
plots of both sites are shown below. The two sets of
data have been normalised to give the same range of
shading (compensating for the different moisture
conditions on the two dates.). Light shading indicates
high resistance (dry) and dark shading low resistance
(wet). The data has been interpolated to aid
visualisation of the features.
The features shown as path are ridges in that are
visible on the ground and in the aerial photograph
below. They seem to be quite narrow for paths and may be
the top edge of a wall. The feature extends into the
garden of 22 Ospringe Street (Also known as Watling
Street), where it is not visible on the surface.
|
|

|
 |
1
Swale Borough Council c 1990 Townscape Survey:
Ospringe Village
2
Smith G.H 1980 ‘The Excavation of the
Hospital of St Mary, Ospringe commonly called Maison
Dieu’ Arch. Cant. XCV pp 81-184
3
Parfitt, K 1990 ‘Archaeological excavation and Recording
at Nos 14-18 the Street, Ospringe’. Kent Minor Sites
series No 2. KARU
4
Margetts, Andrew 2008 Archaeological Investigations at
Fairways, Ospringe. Archaeology South East: unpublished
site report.
5
Survey of Kentish Estates 1571 Archives of St Johns
College, Cambridge
6
OS 1865 (1904 reprint) Sheet XXXIV Scale
1:2500
7
OS 1907 Sheet XXXIV Scale: 1:2500
8
Smith 1980 op cit
9
Whitehead , R. 2003 Buckles Greenlight Publishing p114
diag.733
10
Clarkstone J 2008 Resistance Survey Report for Barkaways,
Ospringe FSARG Faversham. Forthcoming online
www.community-archaeology.org.uk |
|
|
|
 |